ScholarOne - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS REFORM IN COMESA
AND THE SADC: 1992 TO 2023
Abstract
This study compares the efforts of the Southern African Development
Community (SADC) and the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
(COMESA) towards electoral systems reform and how this is geared to
ensuring peace and stability through constructive management of
conflicts. Content analysis and a comparative historical research method
was used for data collection. The study shows that the cases of poor
electoral systems reform which had been sources of conflicts in both
sub-regional organizations can be seen as consequent on the statesmen or
differing factions not having given room for fair competition in their
territorial jurisdiction. Using the state level theory of classical
realism, the study argues that the quest for power accumulation by most
statesmen or factions in SADC and COMESA makes it difficult to achieve
electoral systems reform which thereby made electoral conflicts to
prevail. This comparative evaluation can help in the constructive
management of conflicts.