Seven of the reviewed articles were found to be High (Table 11). For example, A18 mentioned the contribution of quantitative and qualitative findings to each other with the following sentences: “Do quantitative results from the process of engineering-oriented STEM integration activities and qualitative results from the views on the implementation process support each other?”
We evaluated A1 as Moderate, as it contains quantitative and qualitative questions that provide versatile solutions for the main purpose of the questions: “1. What are the predominant instructional technologies and methods that lecturers in teacher education institutions apply, 2? What are the significant attributes of teaching and learning that should be practiced in contemporary teacher education programs according to the teacher educators? 3. What characterizes a pedagogical framework that is based on the integration of social constructivism and cloud technologies?”
16 articles were identified as Low. For example, A16: