Seven of the reviewed articles were found to be High (Table 11). For
example, A18 mentioned the contribution of quantitative and qualitative
findings to each other with the following sentences: “Do
quantitative results from the process of engineering-oriented STEM
integration activities and qualitative results from the views on the
implementation process support each other?”
We evaluated A1 as Moderate, as it contains quantitative and qualitative
questions that provide versatile solutions for the main purpose of the
questions: “1. What are the predominant instructional
technologies and methods that lecturers in teacher education
institutions apply, 2? What are the significant attributes of teaching
and learning that should be practiced in contemporary teacher education
programs according to the teacher educators? 3. What characterizes a
pedagogical framework that is based on the integration of social
constructivism and cloud technologies?”
16 articles were identified as Low. For example, A16: