New Zealand 2017 Election -- The Influence of Voters' Social-Economic
Status on the Party Choice
Abstract
A considerable amount of literature has been published about election
studies around the world. An area that interests many scholars in those
studies is the influence of voters’ social-economic status on the party
of choice they voted for in elections (Coffe, Voweles & Curtin, 2014).
Therefore, this research intends to identify if the social-economic
status of voters influenced their voted choice of party in New Zealand’s
2017 election.
It is significant to conduct this study because all political parties
present themselves as universal with policies that are beneficial to all
citizens (Afnoso, 2016). However, an increasing gap between the rich and
the poor should question those policies. It should concern the
government, the bureaucrats, and the public because it can affect the
social, political, and economic participation of disadvantage groups
(Szewczyk, 2015). And because inequality affects all spheres of life, it
can influence voters’ party choices. The party choice is so significant
because it is the party with the majority of candidates that eventually
forms the government and which decides on all of the country’s affairs
which will affect every individual citizen and future generations too.
Because of its significance, much research has been conducted in
different countries to identify the influence that voters’
social-economic status has on their party choice. For example, Winters
et al. (2017) conducted a related study in Britain, Pietsch (2017) in
Australia and Suryanarayan (2018) in India and they discovered that
there was strong correlation between the social economic status of
voters and their party choice. However, a comparable study conducted in
the United States by Gelman, Kenworthy and Su (2010) found that there
was no clear pattern of relationship between voters’ social economic
status and their party choice. Gelman et al. (2010) suggest that the
influence must be due to other factors such as religion, education, or
gender. In New Zealand, Coffe et al. (2014) conducted similar research
and found that inequality does affect the party choice of voters and is
a significant issue to be addressed. The inequality factors include
income inequality, gender inequality, and inequality in the status of
other minority groups.
Because gender inequality exists just like income inequality, the
probability of gender inequality influencing an election outcome is also
high. Coffe et al (2014) explain that it is the support of equality that
was widely accepted, giving rise to gender equality rights, income
equality rights and the equality and respect for minority groups. Even
today, these groups still demand more recognition from the state and the
desire of achieving their demands can influence their party choices.
Therefore, this research tries to establish the relationship between
voters’ social-economic status and the party they voted for (their party
choice) in the 2017 election. Because of the nature of the issue, gender
inequality might also influence voters’ choices. Gender is used in this
study as an interfering variable in the relationship between
social-economic status and party-choice.