loading page

Rationing health and social goods during pandemics: guidance for Ghanaian decision makers
  • +3
  • Amos Laar,
  • Debra DeBruin,
  • Richard Ofori-Asenso,
  • Matilda Essandoh Laar,
  • Barbara Redman,
  • Arthur Caplan
Amos Laar
University of Ghana

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Debra DeBruin
Author Profile
Richard Ofori-Asenso
Author Profile
Matilda Essandoh Laar
Author Profile
Barbara Redman
Author Profile
Arthur Caplan
Author Profile


Healthcare rationing during pandemics has been widely discussed in global bioethics literature. However, existing scenarios and analyses have focused on high income countries, except for very few disease areas such as HIV treatment where some analyses related to African countries exist. We argue that the lack of scholastic discourse, and by extension, professional and democratic engagement on the subject constitute an unacceptable ethical omission. Not only have African governments failed to develop robust ethical plans for pandemics, ethicists in this region have been unable to ignite public discourse on rationing. Therefore, we aim to initiate a debate on how rationing health and social goods could be done ethically in Ghana during the current and future pandemics.
The paper discusses and critiques some moral considerations (utilitarian, equity, equal worth, urgent need, and the prioritarian principles) for rationing and their relevance in the Ghanaian context. This contribution may facilitate ethical decision-making during COVID-19 in Ghana and other African settings where hardly any rationing guidelines exist
Sep 2021Published in Clinical Ethics volume 16 issue 3 on pages 165-170. 10.1177/1477750920977095