State Intercept New Cases (log) Estimate
Alabama 44.70 1.61
Alaska 33.64 1.06
Arizona 50.55 2.06
Arkansas 42.67 1.40
California 58.93 2.59
Colorado 54.21 2.22
Connecticut 43.60 1.42
Delaware 40.71 1.19
Florida 55.82 2.38
Georgia 53.08 2.21
Hawaii 43.21 1.72
Idaho 43.66 1.44
Illinois 56.58 2.35
Indiana 49.09 1.84
Iowa 41.95 1.27
Kansas 45.89 1.73
Kentucky 47.64 1.83
Louisiana 44.59 1.53
Maine 43.33 1.61
Maryland 49.13 1.95
Massachusetts 48.25 1.74
Michigan 48.71 1.79
Minnesota 53.13 2.10
Mississippi 45.71 1.69
Missouri 50.78 1.98
Montana 30.15 0.76
Nebraska 43.17 1.47
Nevada 39.54 1.21
New Hampshire 42.38 1.44
New Jersey 48.53 1.97
New Mexico 41.14 1.47
New York 54.43 2.26
North Carolina 54.24 2.21
North Dakota 35.76 0.93
Ohio 55.60 2.22
Oklahoma 46.04 1.81
Oregon 52.26 1.99
Pennsylvania 56.43 2.43
Rhode Island 37.21 1.20
South Carolina 48.39 1.92
South Dakota 41.24 1.44
Tennessee 51.15 2.06
Texas 57.31 2.57
Utah 52.98 2.10
Vermont 31.48 0.85
Virginia 56.56 2.32
Washington 51.54 2.07
West Virginia 42.87 1.44
Wisconsin 46.91 1.78
Wyoming 35.92 1.12
Note: Calculating and reporting standard errors, statistical significance, and effect sizes for random slopes is complex and a field-wide consensus on best practice is lacking (Lorah, 2018), so no measure or indication of significance is included in Table 2. Still, relative state-level variation in intercepts and slopes may be of interest to some readers and so intercepts and coefficients are reported here. Note: Calculating and reporting standard errors, statistical significance, and effect sizes for random slopes is complex and a field-wide consensus on best practice is lacking (Lorah, 2018), so no measure or indication of significance is included in Table 2. Still, relative state-level variation in intercepts and slopes may be of interest to some readers and so intercepts and coefficients are reported here. Note: Calculating and reporting standard errors, statistical significance, and effect sizes for random slopes is complex and a field-wide consensus on best practice is lacking (Lorah, 2018), so no measure or indication of significance is included in Table 2. Still, relative state-level variation in intercepts and slopes may be of interest to some readers and so intercepts and coefficients are reported here.