Introduction
The studies to improve the understanding about human animal interaction are increasing day by day (McCune, et al, 2020). Human animal interaction is ancient and is related with human health (Serpell, 2006). This relationship provided bases for the discovery of human animal bound (Hines, 2003). Biological impact of human animal interaction is a focus of modern researchers (Pendry & Vandagriff, 2020). Because animals even strayed maintain meaning for human beings around the globe (Davey, Zhao & Khor, 2020). The human animal relationship is so strong that the experts of robotics develop robots getting insights from human animal interaction (Grollman, 2014).
A human personality study is a multi-dimensional area. In this area the relationship of human personality dimensions with human orientation towards animal and its relationship with animal have been reported in a few studies (Herzog & Mathews, 1997). Some studies have studied animal contribution and utility relationship with human attitudes towards the animals (Serpell, 2004a). Another study examined a similarity in human attitudes towards animals (Batt, 2009). Human attitudes towards animals with reference to our empathy towards the animals have also been studied (Taylor & Signal, 2005). However a few studies found that having a pet is not related with our personality (Belk, 1996). However, some studies studied close relationship between personality and pet keeping (Kidd & Kidds, 1980: Perrine & Osbourne, 1998: Cameron & Mattson, 1972).
The study of the relationship between personality and intelligence in a known area and the relationship between these two important psychological constructs have been established in various studies (Goff & Ackerman, 1992), because, these are related with our day to day living, function and social relationship (Lopes, Salovey & Straus, 2003). Personality and intelligence also influence our attitudes towards life (Vakola, Tsaousis & Nikolaou, 2004) to the extent that these predict our success in life (Laidra, Pullmann & Allik, 2007) and about our skills (Bastian, Burns & Nettelbeck, 2005).
There could be a question that how keeping a pet could be related with abient intelligence (Augusto & McCullagh, 2007: Belk, 1996)) if it is so, than is intelligence and pet keeping related? “Mentalizing” is a known human feature and we use mentalizing for ours pets (Epley, Schroeder & Waytz, 2013) in a few cases. A few relevant questions could be, why it does so in so an so situation and how it would behave when, or was it more enthusiastic now, reflect thinking about thinking and that is related with animals and it is intelligent and could be related with intelligence? Moreover, certain studies have reflected that pets facilitated the learning process of children, was that participation something that could be named as intelligence or it was something to promote intelligence as an external aid again is a question (Shafer, 2006). Moreover, social and emotional development are related with personality as well as intelligence and studies support that animals played a role in both kinds of developments (Triebenbacher, 1998: Robin & Bensel, 1985: McNicholas & Collis, 2001).