Conclusion

Our exploration of social inclusion describes how a fine balance between commonalities and differences, powers the engine of change. Whilst we recognize that this small-scale study cannot be generalized to larger populations, the work does point to some potential future directions to add value to the existing body of knowledge. In essence, it is about how shared values may help overcome potential obstacles encountered through diversity. Furthermore, we have shown how the act of sharing spaces and working together may support the attitude and behaviour changes that help build these bridges and new community assets (Miller & Russell, 2010). Creativity is one such channel, but by no means the only one, where these potential barriers may be tackled. These changes are often subjective and challenging to appraise. These initial changes can be unpacked and explained, acting as a platform from which interventions leading to wider social impacts can be launched (Reinders, 2000). As with many episodes of social gain we start experimenting at the margins of society in small isolated spaces, progressively expanding to other activity domains, thereby progressively getting closer to the core of society.
The challenge here, lies precisely in extending these findings to other environments, people and settings. In our work for instance, we have identified a number of target organizations where this work could be up-scaled. We plan to extend findings about Intentional Interventions in working with community development staff to build on local and regional efforts. In so doing, we hope to craft Best Practice in engaging with marginalized populations.