Conclusion
Our exploration of social inclusion describes how a fine balance between
commonalities and differences, powers the engine of change. Whilst we
recognize that this small-scale study cannot be generalized to larger
populations, the work does point to some potential future directions to
add value to the existing body of knowledge. In essence, it is about how
shared values may help overcome potential obstacles encountered through
diversity. Furthermore, we have shown how the act of sharing spaces and
working together may support the attitude and behaviour changes that
help build these bridges and new community assets (Miller & Russell,
2010). Creativity is one such channel, but by no means the only one,
where these potential barriers may be tackled. These changes are often
subjective and challenging to appraise. These initial changes can be
unpacked and explained, acting as a platform from which interventions
leading to wider social impacts can be launched (Reinders, 2000). As
with many episodes of social gain we start experimenting at the margins
of society in small isolated spaces, progressively expanding to other
activity domains, thereby progressively getting closer to the core of
society.
The challenge here, lies precisely in extending these findings to other
environments, people and settings. In our work for instance, we have
identified a number of target organizations where this work could be
up-scaled. We plan to extend findings about Intentional Interventions in
working with community development staff to build on local and regional
efforts. In so doing, we hope to craft Best Practice in engaging with
marginalized populations.