Abstract
When science as a governance technique is applied and rationalized in
social governance, educational improvement studies play their core role
in educational governance. Recently, Improvement Science in Education
(ISE) has introduced a large number of research paradigms, including
critical, participatory, advocacy, and emancipatory paradigms. This
paper proposes that the ISE lacks a vigilant paradigm as a postmodern
way of thinking. Through the deconstruction of the concept of
“progress”, this paper attempts to propose the important role of
postmodern thinking in the construction of ISE. This article argues that
the secular meaning of “progress” is tacitly accepted and ignored in
the science of educational improvement. Moreover, this paper develops
Derrida’s theory of political vigilance by introducing Taoist thought to
the ISE.