ScholarOne - The Spontaneous Resemblance Between Kant's Aesthetics and
Smith's Capitalism
Abstract
There are a number of ways in which Kant can be said to provide the
“aesthetics of capitalism”. This paper argues specifically that
central innovations of Kantian aesthetics—purposiveness without a
purpose, artistic genius, the free play of the faculties, and the
contrapurposive sublime—are to the philosophy of mind what the
“invisible hand” is to capitalist social formation and economic
practice. The relevant connection between Kant’s aesthetic psychology
and Adam Smith’s capitalist political-economy is that each depends on
the claim that order can emerge without an orderer operating according
to prior intent, purpose, design, or conscious control. Along with Hume
and the central framework of the Scottish Enlightenment more generally,
Smith and Kant both seek to explain how order can arise spontaneously;
they simply attend to different domains—Smith looking outward to
social order and Kant looking inward towards mental order. However, once
the logical and metaphysical structure of spontaneous order is seen as
the key issue across multiple domains, then Kantian aesthetics and
emerging capitalist social formations appear as two sides of the same
coin.