Agreed terms and conditions name style
Video versus in person hearings: Determining witness credibility
Because of health risks during the global pandemic of 2020, many fact finding hearings previously held in-person were offered in a video format. The return of in-person hearings is reemerging as many practitioners contend that video hearings are inadequate for viewing witness demeanor, thereby hindering determination of witness credibility. This paper summarizes the best available evidence and concludes: (1) personal demeanor is a not reliable factor for weighing witness credibility or deception detection, (2) a variety of indicators to be used by a “trier of fact” are more accurate in evaluating witness credibility, (3) and a video format is more reliable than an in-person hearing in assessing witness credibility. It concludes with an examination of what has been learned and the opportunities recorded video hearings offer for assessing witness credibility in the future.
Funding
no grant funding
History
Declaration of conflicts of interest
no conflict of interestCorresponding author email
tzane@unm.eduLead author country
- United States
Lead author job role
- Career College Faculty
Lead author institution
University of New MexicoHuman Participants
- No