Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Video versus in person hearings.docx (67.35 kB)

Video versus in person hearings: Determining witness credibility

Download (67.35 kB)
posted on 2021-08-12, 21:04 authored by thomas zane reevesthomas zane reeves

Because of health risks during the global pandemic of 2020, many fact finding hearings previously held in-person were offered in a video format. The return of in-person hearings is reemerging as many practitioners contend that video hearings are inadequate for viewing witness demeanor, thereby hindering determination of witness credibility. This paper summarizes the best available evidence and concludes: (1) personal demeanor is a not reliable factor for weighing witness credibility or deception detection, (2) a variety of indicators to be used by a “trier of fact” are more accurate in evaluating witness credibility, (3) and a video format is more reliable than an in-person hearing in assessing witness credibility. It concludes with an examination of what has been learned and the opportunities recorded video hearings offer for assessing witness credibility in the future.


no grant funding


Declaration of conflicts of interest

no conflict of interest

Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • United States

Lead author job role

  • Career College Faculty

Lead author institution

University of New Mexico

Human Participants

  • No

Ethics statement

No human subjects involved

Comments (1)

Log in to write your comment here...

Agreed terms and conditions name style