Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Transparency in Justice AI. 2nd V.pdf (435.82 kB)
Download file

Transparency in Predictive Algorithms: A Judicial Perspective

Download (435.82 kB)
posted on 2021-07-21, 00:53 authored by Md. Abdul MalekMd. Abdul Malek

Notwithstanding the apparent hyperbole about AI promises for judicial modernization, there arise deep concerns that span from unfairness, privacy invasion, bias, discrimination to the lack of transparency and legitimacy, etc. Likewise, critics branded their application in the judicial precincts as ethically, legally, and technically distressing. Accordingly, whereas there is already an ongoing transparency debate on board, this paper attempts to revisit, extend and contribute to such simmering debate with a particular focus from a judicial perspective. Since preserving and promoting trust and confidence in the judiciary as a whole appears to be imperative, it uses a searchlight to explore how and why justice algorithms ought to be transparent as to their training data, methods, and outcomes. This paper also ends up delineating the tentative paths to do away with black-box effects and suggesting the way out for the use of algorithms in high-stake areas like the judicial settings.


Declaration of conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest

Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • Bangladesh

Lead author job role

  • Independent researcher

Human Participants

  • No

Comments (1)

Log in to write your comment here...

Agreed terms and conditions name style

Usage metrics