Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The Relationship between Drug-Related Incidents and Violent Incidents in Correctional Facilities
preprintposted on 21.10.2019, 23:28 by Anthony CarboAnthony Carbo
This researcher collected data using a deputy report writing system (DRWS). The system allows for the exact collection of data about deputy sheriff reports in the target population. Specifically, this researcher collected and analyzed data, using an Excel’s Statistical Analysis Tool, about the number of deputy reports documenting battery incidents among inmates (e.g., assault and battery), resisting incidents (e.g., delay correctional staff and resist officer), drug-related incidents (e.g., possession of drugs/ alcohol and found narcotic reports), crisis intervention incidents (e.g., attempt suicide and harm-to-others due to mental illness), and miscellaneous reports (e.g., theft and vandalism). Except for confidential reports (reports that are not open to the public) and supplemental reports (follow-up reports for original incidents), this study examined all reports generated by deputy sheriffs in the correctional setting, for the target population, over a 27-week period. The target population for the study are adult inmates inside one Southwestern jail system in the United States.
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of conflicts of interestThe author declares no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author firstname.lastname@example.org
Lead author countryUnited States
Lead author job roleHigher Education Faculty 4-yr College
Lead author institutionBrandman University: Chapman University System
Ethics statementBrandman University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved this study. The current research was an analysis of existing data. This study counted the number of reports deputies generated and grouped each report under one of five incident categories for analysis. This study did not collect any names of inmates or correctional staff. This research also did not collect any information that could directly or indirectly link anyone to an incident report – such as case numbers, employee/ badge numbers, or booking numbers. The researcher did not obtain identifiable confidential information about human subjects. Furthermore, the researcher excluded all confidential reports. This study also did not supply the name of the county sheriff department or related courthouses in the current work. The research limited the current investigation to the quantitative examination of the frequency of deputy-generated reports.
Log in to write your comment here...