Advance
Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Research Trends of Japanese Public Administration PP2020.docx (251.27 kB)
0/0

Research Trends of Japanese Public Administration: Statistical content analyses of the titles of "Public Administration Review Quarterly" (1978 to 2019)

Download (251.27 kB)
preprint
posted on 27.04.2020 by Yasutoshi Moteki
This paper quantitatively explains research trends in postwar administrative studies in Japan using statistical analyses of nearly 40 years of article titles from Public Administration Review Quarterly, from its first issue (1978) to the 165th issue (2019). Co-occurrence network analysis and correspondence analysis revealed changes in research interests. There was substantially more research on administrative reforms through the post-war Showa and Heisei eras.
The configuration figures of correspondence analysis can be interpreted to mean that the first dimension concerns administrative reforms; the second dimension concerns historical events/administrative systems; and the third dimension concerns evaluations and Kaizen. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the studies during the Showa era (1978-1988) could be partly characterized by the two extracted compound words: the United States and the United Kingdom. Japan became a feature of studies of public administration during the Heisei era (1989–2018). These features are basically consistent with the previous quantitative studies.

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

History

Declaration of conflicts of interest

The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Corresponding author email

moteki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Lead author country

Japan

Lead author job role

Higher Education Faculty 4-yr College

Lead author institution

Hiroshima University

Human Participants

No

Ethics statement

This is not a study of humans, and thus does not require ethical approval concerning data gathering.

Exports

Comments

Log in to write your comment here...