Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
PandemicMakers_BrowderEtal_Preprint_2021.docx (965.41 kB)
Download file

Pandemic makers: How citizen groups mobilized resources to meet local needs in a global health crisis

Download (965.41 kB)
posted on 2022-10-05, 21:21 authored by Russell BrowderRussell Browder, Stella Seyb, Angela Forgues, Howard Aldrich

The enormous scale of suffering, breadth of societal impact, and ongoing uncertainty wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic introduced dynamics seldom examined in the crisis entrepreneurship literature. Previous research indicates that when a crisis causes a failure of public goods, spontaneous citizen ventures often emerge to leverage unique local knowledge to rapidly customize abundant external resources to meet immediate needs. However, as outsiders, emergent citizen groups responding to the dire shortage of personal protective equipment at the onset of COVID-19 lacked local knowledge and legitimacy. In this study, we examine how entrepreneurial citizens mobilized collective resources in attempts to gain acceptance and meet local needs amid the urgency of the pandemic. Through longitudinal case studies of citizen groups connected to makerspaces in four U.S. cities, we study how they adapted to address the resource and legitimacy limitations they encountered. We identify three mechanisms—augmenting, circumventing, and attenuating—that helped transient citizen groups calibrate their resource mobilization based on what they learned over time. We highlight how extreme temporality imposes limits on resourcefulness and legitimation, making it critical for collective entrepreneurs to learn when to work within their limitations rather than try to overcome them. 


Declaration of conflicts of interest


Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • United States

Lead author job role

  • Higher Education Faculty 4-yr College

Lead author institution

University of Oklahoma

Ethics statement

This study met the criteria for exemption from institutional review board (IRB), as approved by the University of Oklahoma. Verbal informed consent was obtained and recorded in audio files made during interviews.

Terms agreed

  • Yes, I agree to Advance terms

Comments (2)

Log in to write your comment here...

The blog is very helpful Read More

Agreed terms and conditions name style