Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
More than a list (peprint V2).pdf (222.22 kB)

More than a list: The Grand Challenges Approach and legitimate agents of social change

Download (222.22 kB)
posted on 2023-02-27, 13:24 authored by Efrosyni KonstantinouEfrosyni Konstantinou, Ralf MüllerRalf Müller

 In this paper we ask who is a legitimate agent of social change for Grand Challenges. To answer this question, we build on the philosophies of Hannah Arendt, Friedrich Nietzsche, Maurice Blanchot and Emmanuel Levinas on the human condition. This is important in sensitizing the project management community to the political responsibility of the project manager at times of crises and Grand Challenges, when new social orders, such as the Grand Challenges Approach (GCA), emerge and are delivered through projects. We introduce philosophers who have spoken about the human condition a) to escape definitions of legitimacy which have arisen from the very social processes and institutions which contribute to social injustices; and, b) because we all share the human condition irrespective of origin, religion, race, gender, education and life experiences, and as such it carries significant democratic potential. The philosophers tell us that an agent of social change is s/he who acts with the Other as the end goal in mind, and that legitimate is the social agent who appears in front of the watchful eye of society and fully discloses past, present and future intentions (Arendt); who can embody meaning and make decisions based on their humanity (Nietzsche); who can echo ideals which extend thought, intelligence, decisions and actions from what is already known to the creation of new spaces of action (Blanchot); and, finally, who can stand upright and engage with fellow-world-citizens in defining what is to be known, the reality of tomorrow (Levinas). 


Declaration of conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest

Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Lead author job role

  • Higher Education Researcher

Lead author institution

University College London

Human Participants

  • No

Ethics statement

This study does not require GDPR or other ethics approvals

Terms agreed

  • Yes, I agree to Advance terms


Log in to write your comment here...