Agreed with this. Click here
In search of good notes- Developing a rubric for grading L2 lecture notes
This study investigates using a notetaking rubric to grade notetaking in second language (L2) listening. The aim of this study was to examine if the teacher-researchers (TRs) graded each other’s listening notes and rate information units (IUs) similarly when using a notetaking rubric. An IU is defined as the smallest unit of knowledge that can be judged as a separate assertion. Using this foundation, the TRs developed a 4-point notetaking rubric (i.e., IU0, IU1) to identify different multi-tiered IUs in notetaking. A 3-point notes rating was also given to each notetaking. Data were collected using a notetaking rubric, ratings sheet, and an online survey. The findings showed that TRs (n=5) were inconsistent when grading each set, totalling eight different notetakings. Specifically, TRs were also unable to identify the same IUs when grading the same notes. These findings indicate that further evaluation of the TR-developed rubric is needed to add validity and reliability to the potential tool for notetaking grading.
Funding
no funding
History
Declaration of conflicts of interest
No conflicts of interestCorresponding author email
naheen_madarbakus-ring@nucba.ac.jpLead author country
- Japan
Lead author job role
- Higher Education Faculty 4-yr College
Lead author institution
Nagoya University of Commerce and BusinessEthics statement
all ethical procedures were followed. All study particpants agreed to their participation. Participants were treated anonymously.Terms agreed
- Yes, I agree to Advance terms