Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
In search of good notes- Developing a rubric for grading L2 lecture notes.docx (9.2 MB)
Download file

In search of good notes- Developing a rubric for grading L2 lecture notes

Download (9.2 MB)
posted on 2022-07-28, 23:00 authored by Nathan DuckerNathan Ducker, Naheen Madarbakus


This study investigates using a notetaking rubric to grade notetaking in second language (L2) listening. The aim of this study was to examine if the teacher-researchers (TRs) graded each other’s listening notes and rate information units (IUs) similarly when using a notetaking rubric. An IU is defined as the smallest unit of knowledge that can be judged as a separate assertion. Using this foundation, the TRs developed a 4-point notetaking rubric (i.e., IU0, IU1) to identify different multi-tiered IUs in notetaking. A 3-point notes rating was also given to each notetaking. Data were collected using a notetaking rubric, ratings sheet, and an online survey. The findings showed that TRs (n=5) were inconsistent when grading each set, totalling eight different notetakings. Specifically, TRs were also unable to identify the same IUs when grading the same notes. These findings indicate that further evaluation of the TR-developed rubric is needed to add validity and reliability to the potential tool for notetaking grading. 


no funding


Declaration of conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest

Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • Japan

Lead author job role

  • Higher Education Faculty 4-yr College

Lead author institution

Nagoya University of Commerce and Business

Ethics statement

all ethical procedures were followed. All study particpants agreed to their participation. Participants were treated anonymously.

Terms agreed

  • Yes, I agree to Advance terms

Comments (2)

Log in to write your comment here...

Agreed with this. Click here

Agreed terms and conditions name style

Usage metrics

    Advance: Social Sciences & Humanities