Abstract
This study investigates using a notetaking rubric to grade notetaking in
second language (L2) listening. The aim of this study was to examine if
the teacher-researchers (TRs) graded each other’s listening notes and
rate information units (IUs) similarly when using a notetaking rubric.
An IU is defined as the smallest unit of knowledge that can be judged as
a separate assertion. Using this foundation, the TRs developed a 4-point
notetaking rubric (i.e., IU0, IU1) to identify different multi-tiered
IUs in notetaking. A 3-point notes rating was also given to each
notetaking. Data were collected using a notetaking rubric, ratings
sheet, and an online survey. The findings showed that TRs (n=5) were
inconsistent when grading each set, totalling eight different
notetakings. Specifically, TRs were also unable to identify the same IUs
when grading the same notes. These findings indicate that further
evaluation of the TR-developed rubric is needed to add validity and
reliability to the potential tool for notetaking grading.