Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
How does Brain Matter-The Case of Dignified Mind and Law-converted.pdf (277.44 kB)

How does Brain Matter? The Case of Dignified Mind and Law

Download (277.44 kB)
posted on 2019-08-19, 23:40 authored by Chetan SinhaChetan Sinha

What does the brain mean in a legal domain and how the integration of neuroscience and law goes beyond the practical difficulties highlighted by the social scientists and legal theorists? On the one hand, the legal theorists took it as a conceptual error and on the other hand, advocates of neurosciences took it as a promising emerging field of integration. Some scholars took an alternative route considering it as a fascinating element of scientific discourse. The present article aims to show that the coming of “brain language” in comparison to the other forensic languages in the everyday legal discourse is not going to become a reality, as truth inferred through the everyday experiences and the interpretations of scientific knowledge by the judges. Scientific knowledge through the mapping of active brain area by the available brain visualising techniques shows the correlation between brain and behaviour and not the causation. So its use in the legal domain seems less institutionalised, showing the determinism of the brain as less authentic in itself when compared with the intuitive path embedded in the culture and history.


Declaration of conflicts of interest


Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • India

Lead author job role

  • Further Education Lecturer

Lead author institution

OP Jindal Global University

Human Participants

  • No


Log in to write your comment here...

Usage metrics

    Advance: Social Sciences & Humanities