Critical discourse analysis of the content of popular Telegram channels
and groups in the field of discussion and critique of social and
political issues in Iran
Abstract
Thanks for taking the time to review my handwriting. This article, as it
is extracted from my master's thesis, cannot retell all the details of
the research as it should, so I have to make a few points. It is natural
that you do not see anything from the political and theological context
of Iran here, because a wide range of analysis has been used in this
research. The details that should have been mentioned are fully
described in the analyzes, which are the bridge between description and
explanation. Due to the large volume of content, it is not allowed to be
presented in the number of pages, if necessary, I can send you some
samples of analysis. As for the introductory sentences, I have to say
that it is a ground for discussion, and CDA is the basis of my writing,
and this cannot be concealed, but keep in mind that my analyzes are
novel. Sufficient explanations are provided on how to introduce and
select channels and groups. By focusing on the code and its set, the
reader will understand where the analysis was headed and what results
were drawn from it. Regarding the research method, I must say that the
quality of the content has been measured with the help of its
quantitative expression, as you know, the Fairclough method is a
combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.