Preprints are early versions of research articles that have not been peer reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive and should not be reported in news media as established information.
2. Cooperative, Competitive and Hybrid Motivated Information Processing in Teams.docx (67.38 kB)
Download file

Cooperative, Competitive and Hybrid Motivated Information Processing in Teams

Download (67.38 kB)
posted on 2021-02-24, 22:22 authored by Tahia Alam Macias, Ph.D.Tahia Alam Macias, Ph.D.

Currently, there is a proliferation of studies examining group and team dynamics, as an increasing number of organizations are incorporating group and team-based structures. Extant literature has provided mixed findings regarding the influence of reward structures on various team outcomes. E.g., More rapid activity in teams has been found for competitive reward structure, with diminishing quality of work (Mailer, 1929). Which type of reward structure (competitive, cooperative or hybrid) has the best implication for team performance in organizations? This paper aims to address this question by incorporating the mechanism (i.e., epistemic and social motivation) and moderating variable (i.e., need for affiliation). Understanding the motivated information processing in groups model (MIP-G) and antecedents of team performance has important managerial implications. This moderator (i.e., need for affiliation) has not been examined in relation to all three types of reward structures in past studies. This paper hopes to extend the literature of reward structures and motivated information processing model by encompassing this new boundary condition. It is essential to incorporate novel contexts while examining relationships among variables as this approach further develops existing theories.


Not applicable.

Research Foundation - Flanders

Find out more...


Declaration of conflicts of interest

There was no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author email

Lead author country

  • United States

Lead author job role

  • PhD Student

Lead author institution

Southern Illinois University Carbondale

Human Participants

  • No

Ethics statement

Not applicable as no data was collected.


Log in to write your comment here...