Exploring Diener's multi-dimensional conceptualization of well-being
through network psychometrics
Abstract
Previous research has addressed the study of the well-being structure
focusing on the separability among hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions by
means of latent variable approaches. Diener’s tripartite model of
Subjective Well-Being (SWB) has often been identified with hedonic
well-being, while flourishing (i.e., positive functioning) has been
classified as a proxy for eudaimonic well-being. Instead of pursuing a
theory-driven approach, the structure of well-being dimensions can be
retrieved by means of network psychometrics that is a highly
informative, data-driven approach that allows the model structure to
spontaneously emerge from the relationships among indicators.
Furthermore, we propose a strength centrality decomposition that is able
to summarize the influence of a specific indicator within its dimension
and between the other dimensions. Contrary to the theoretical conjecture
that the separability among well-being dimensions can be grounded on a
hedonic and eudaimonic distinction, our results point to a
categorization of the Diener’s well-being indicators based on the type
of information they convey, that is global evaluation of life
satisfaction, positive and negative affective experiences, and perceived
positive functioning in life.