CONCLUSION
In order to find pertinent research on the adoption of digital education
and its effects on students who are incarcerated, we conducted extensive
consultations when conducting this review. The past ten years have seen
little study. This implies that further study in these fields is
necessary.
According to our research, some nations have adopted and used digital
learning, but there is a significant digital gap. Due to concerns that
allowing incarcerated pupils access to the internet might compromise the
security of the prison system, it was forbidden for them to use it.
Our findings show that embracing technology enhanced teaching/learning
in the prison will be beneficial in the following ways:
- Technology-enhanced learning has the potential to provide incarcerated
students with access to educational resources and opportunities that
may not be available in traditional correctional facilities.
- The use of technology in correctional facilities can help to reduce
recidivism rates and increase post-release employment and educational
opportunities for incarcerated individuals.
- However, the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning in
correctional facilities may depend on several factors, including
access to technology, the quality of educational content, and the
support of correctional staff.
- The limited number of studies available on this topic suggests a need
for further research to better understand the potential benefits and
challenges of technology-enhanced learning for incarcerated students.
Conclusively, technology-enhanced learning has the potential to be a
valuable tool for improving educational outcomes and reducing recidivism
rates for incarcerated students. However, more research is needed to
determine the most effective ways to implement technology-enhanced
learning in correctional facilities and ensure that all incarcerated
individuals have access to these resources.